joomla vector social icons
English English
en Englishhr Croatiancs Czechda Danishnl Dutchfr Frenchde Germanit Italianpt Portuguesesl Slovenianes Spanish
  • Home
  • News
    • Media
    • Publications
    • Newsletters
  • Project info
    • Project partners
    • Case studies
    • Work packages
    • Project deliverables
    • Project milestones
    • Funding
    • Copyright, disclaimer and Privacy
  • Project activities
  • Downloads
  • About us
  • Blog
  • My-SPRINT
    • Login


The SPRINT-project aims to develop a Global Health Risk Assessment Toolbox

to assess impacts of Plant Protection Products (PPPs) on environment and human health

 

 

 

 

The SPRINT project will make an internationally valid contribution to assess integrated risks and impacts of pesticides on environment and human health, both at regional and European level. SPRINT will inform and accelerate the adoption of innovative transition pathways towards more sustainable plant protection in the context of a global health approach. 

In memoriam: Klaas Oostindie

 

klaas memoriam 

Read more: In memoriam: Klaas Oostindie

Emergency use of a neonicotinoid: unravelling the complexities behind the UK approval

On Friday 8th January, the UK government decided to allow the use of a neonicotinoid-based pesticide, thiamethoxam in emergencies.

Read more about the pros and cons in our latest SPRINT blog. 

blog picture 3

New year, new blog!

When medicine feeds the problem: Are pesticides feeding crop pests?

SPRINT recently attended a fascinating talk at the Oxford Real Farming Conference. Researchers from the University of Edinburgh shared their findings surrounding why pesticides may, paradoxically, benefit crop pests. The research was born from the work by a French agronomist, Francis Chaboussou.

Read more about this in the latest SPRINT blog!

blog icon

 

Banned substances continue to enter the market

18 December 2020 - Trouw: Interview Professor Annemarie van Wezel

From the North Pole to Mount Everest, chemicals can be found everywhere. “Thanks to our sensitive measuring methods, we always measure something, even if it is very little, you come across those substances everywhere because we use them all,” says Annemarie van Wezel, professor of environmental ecology and director of the Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics ( IBED) from the University of Amsterdam. "We would love to go back to Adam and Eve, but we can't." Yet she is hopeful. A turnaround is feasible, although this will not be easy.

“Chemicals have brought us a lot, in agriculture, fire safety and the shelf life of materials and food. Ultimately, we must move towards less dependence and better restriction to essential use. But you have to look at that as a whole, not per substance. Because if you prohibit one substance, another that looks a lot like it, will replace it. ”

That makes it so difficult to prevent the spread of toxins, explains Van Wezel. “Compared to biocides, which are now widely used because of the corona pandemic, pesticides are receiving a lot of attention. Upon approval, we assess one product, which may be used in one crop. The problem is that the same substance can also be used in a different crop, end up in a different place or be used in a completely different context. But we don't look at that.”

Violette Geissen's SPRINT project may be able to change the European standards for the approval of chemical substances, Van Wezel thinks. For the authorization of one substance, the accumulation effect of several chemical substances is not considered. Geissen is looking at that cocktail effect. Furthermore, now it is not examined whether a substance is necessary, only what it does.

Read more: Banned substances continue to enter the market

Page 1 of 4

  • Start
  • Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
  • End

Upcoming events

Sustainable use of pesticides - EU commission
  19 Jan 2021, 09:30 - 17:00

Sign up to receive project news

enter your name and e-mail address

The Project

logo sprint h200

SPRINT aims to develop a Global Health Risk Assessment Toolbox to assess impacts of plant protection products (PPP) on ecosystem, plant, animal and human (EPAH) health.

The SPRINT method

Rings

SPRINT consists of 9 interlinked work packages. The distribution and the impacts of PPP on EPAH health will be evaluated at 11 case study sites (CSS)

Measure and Model

Measure

PPP pathways, and direct and indirect animal and human exposure routes will be assessed to improve current fate, exposure, and toxicokinetic models

Stakeholders

stakeholders

SPRINT is based on a multi-actor approach to engage stakeholders and identify needs, improving farmer and citizen awareness, joint development of novel strategies for reduced reliance on PPP use.

Tweets

Tweets by SprintH2020

Funding

SPRINT Project is funded by

the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Programme for research & innovation under grant agreement no 862568

 

Website visitors

Relevant Links

Login/Logout

About us

Copyright and disclaimer

Search this site